For the Compliance & GRC Lead
Five frameworks. Zero parallel spreadsheets.
You are the person who knows that ISO A.5.15, SOC 2 CC6.1 and the regulator's access-management clause are the same control wearing three badges. Compli-Once makes the platform know it too.
Questions you can answer on demand
- How much of this new mandate is already satisfied by controls we run today?
- Which controls are super-controls, satisfying three or more frameworks at once?
- Which framework requirements have no control mapped to them at all?
- What evidence lapses this month, and which frameworks does the lapse affect?
Each answer drills to the control, the evidence, the owner and the date.
Today
Monday morning, before Compli-Once
The same access-control requirement exists in ISO, SOC 2, CSCRF and RBI CSF, and you maintain it four times. A new mandate landed last week and nobody can say how much of it you already satisfy.
Duplicate work compounds
Each new framework multiplies maintenance instead of reusing it. The fifth framework costs as much as the first, and the team's capacity is consumed by copying.
New mandates arrive unscoped
Without a computed crosswalk, the first month of any new obligation is spent guessing how much of it you already do.
Expiry is invisible until it is a finding
A document folder has no concept of validity. The programme looks complete right up to the moment an auditor checks a date.
After
What changes
Implement once, satisfy many
Status and evidence carry to every framework a control maps to. Super-controls, single controls that satisfy several frameworks at once, are surfaced for reuse.
The crosswalk answers before you plan
How much of the new mandate is already done comes back as a percentage with reviewable mappings, not a consultant's guess.
Expiry raises tasks, not findings
Evidence expiry creates renewal tasks before the lapse, so the gap never reaches the auditor first.
The number you take upstairs: coverage of the new mandate on day one.
Your first week
What a proof of concept looks like from your desk
Day 1
Import your control library and policy set. Mappings are proposed with a confidence score and stay pending until you accept them.
Day 2
Adopt the mandate you are least ready for. Read the coverage percentage and the gap list it produces.
Day 4
Author one framework of your own to confirm parity: same crosswalks, dashboards, evidence tooling and reporting as a shipped one.
What you own
Artefacts you can produce from the platform
Crosswalk report showing overlap between any two adopted frameworks
Gap list with owners, due dates and the evidence each gap needs
Control-to-requirement matrix, exportable for any audit engagement
Renewal schedule for every expiring artefact in the vault
The engine
The modules that do the work
Compliance
Frameworks, gap analysis, live posture.
OpenEvidence
A vault with expiry tracking.
OpenAI
Grounded, cited, reviewed.
OpenLoad one framework and one evidence folder. See the crosswalk compute.
Frequently asked questions
How long does framework adoption take?
Adopting a library framework is immediate: the crosswalk computes existing coverage on day one. The remaining work is the genuine gap list, with owners, not a re-implementation of what you already run.
Who reviews AI-proposed mappings?
You do. Every AI-proposed mapping carries a confidence score and stays pending until a human accepts or rejects it. The decision is recorded on the audit trail.