Frameworks · UK & Europe

UK Operational Resilience compliance, run as a living system

The UK operational resilience regime requires regulated financial firms to identify important business services, set impact tolerances for each, map the people, processes, technology and third parties supporting them, and test against severe but plausible scenarios.

Who it applies to

UK banks, building societies, insurers, investment firms, payment and e-money institutions and financial market infrastructures.

What it demands

Important business services

Identification, board approval and periodic review of the service list.

Impact tolerances

Maximum tolerable disruption set per service, with justification.

Mapping

Dependencies mapped across people, processes, technology, facilities and third parties.

Scenario testing

Severe but plausible testing, lessons learned and a self-assessment document maintained.

How Compli-Once runs it

  • 1

    Services, tolerances and dependency maps held as live records linked to controls, vendors and incidents.

  • 2

    Scenario tests run as engagements with findings, owners and CAPAs on the standard audit machinery.

  • 3

    The self-assessment is generated from current state, so the document and the programme cannot drift apart.

What you already satisfy

UK Operational Resilience overlaps with frameworks you may already run. The crosswalk quantifies existing coverage on day one, before you plan a single task.

Implement once, satisfy many

Access control
ISO 27001 A.5.15SOC 2 CC6.1SEBI CSCRF PR.AARBI CSF Access Mgmt
Incident response
ISO 27001 A.5.24SOC 2 CC7.3SEBI CSCRF 6-hour report
Change management
ISO 27001 A.8.32SOC 2 CC8.1PCI DSS v4 6.5

In a representative demonstration environment, 61% of a newly adopted regulatory framework was already satisfied by the existing ISO 27001 programme.

Illustrative, computed live per tenant in the platform.

Frequently asked questions

What does the UK operational resilience regime require?

Firms must identify important business services, set an impact tolerance for each, map the dependencies that support them, test against severe but plausible scenarios, and maintain a board-approved self-assessment.

How are dependency maps kept current?

Mappings link to the same controls, vendors and assets the rest of the programme uses, so a change in one place is reflected everywhere it matters.

How is scenario testing evidenced?

Tests run as engagements: scope, participants, results, findings with owners and due dates, and closure evidence on the same record.

Does it overlap with continuity standards?

Yes. Continuity and resilience controls are crosswalked, so one implementation supports both the regulatory regime and the certification standard.

You're done. We're not.

The audit ends. The readiness doesn't. See it on your own data.